Salisbury
Cathedral is one of the finest buildings to be found anywhere in England. The
story of how it came to be built is as fascinating as the cathedral itself.
Salisbury
Cathedral
Great
cathedrals usually take several centuries to reach completion, with new
additions being made as circumstances dictate, sometimes involving the
demolition of earlier walls or sections. Their appearance today is therefore a
mish-mash of various periods and styles. However, this is not the case at Salisbury, which is unique
amongst English medieval cathedrals for being constructed in the same
architectural style throughout, namely that of Early English Gothic. The main
building work took a mere 38 years to complete.
The old
cathedral
There is
little to be seen today of the original Salisbury Cathedral, built around
1075-92 within the earthwork now know as Old Sarum, about two miles north of
the present cathedral. The first cathedral was burnt down only five days after
its consecration in 1092 and the rebuilt cathedral was only completed a century
later around 1190. However, it too had a very short lifespan.
The walls of
Old Sarum contained not only a cathedral and city but a castle and royal
palace. Constant friction between the church and castle authorities led Bishop
Poore to the conclusion that a new cathedral must be built in a location where
there would be less interference from the castle inhabitants, and the water
meadows near the confluence of the Avon and
Wylye rivers seemed to be an ideal place.
There is a
legend that the site was decided by shooting an arrow from Old Sarum, but it
would have been a remarkable shot to travel that far. Another legend has it
that the arrow hit a deer, and the cathedral site marks the spot where the deer
eventually died. A more prosaic deciding factor might have been the better
access to water supplies away from the windy hilltop of Old Sarum, where only
the outline of the walls of the old cathedral are visible today.
A new
cathedral rises
Nobody knows for
certain who the architect of Bishop Poore’s cathedral was, although the name of
Elias de Derham is sometimes mentioned. Whoever he was, he must have been a
master of his craft. On the gravel (overlaying soft clay) of the water meadows,
with foundations that only go down four feet, 70,000 tons of stone and 3,000
tons of timber were erected in a structure that has stayed in place for more
than 750 years. Other early cathedrals, such as Winchester
and Lincoln, have suffered major collapses, but Salisbury has not, even
when an extra 6,500 tons, in the form of the famous spire, were added as an
afterthought.
This is not
to say that all that weight has not had its consequences. The central columns
that support the tower and spire now bow inwards by about ten inches, and
action to prevent a possible collapse has had to be taken at various junctures.
The ground
plan of Salisbury Cathedral is the standard pattern of a nave and choir with
transepts where the nave and choir meet. There are two, shorter, transepts
leading off the choir, and an extended east end behind the high altar. The main
crossing is therefore half-way along the length of the building, which adds to
the symmetrical appearance that is emphasised by the tower and spire that rise
from this point.
Salisbury
Cathedral is the epitome of the Early English style, which was actually
introduced from France.
The chief characteristic of the style is the lancet, meaning the tall pointed
arch that is usually found in groups of two or three. These lancets are seen in
the internal stonework and also in the windows, which are unbroken by internal
stone traceries. This feature gives an even greater impression of height than
the reality, which is 85 feet from floor to ceiling in the nave and choir.
The slender
columns, which do not block light from the aisle windows, plus the light coming
from the high clerestory windows, serve to give the interior a sense of
lightness and airiness, as does the light colouration of the stone used in the
construction. This is mainly fine-grained Chilmark limestone from quarries not
far from Salisbury, and Purbeck stone from Dorset which can be polished to make excellent stone for
columns and pillars. One variant of Purbeck stone is the so-called Purbeck
marble which is very dark in colour and provides contrast at Salisbury. It is
said that the cathedral has as many windows as days in the year (365) and as
many columns as hours in the year (8760).
Construction
at Salisbury
began in 1220, and by 1258 the main part of the building was complete and the
dedication to St Mary took place. The cloisters, which are the largest in Britain, were
built between 1240 and 1270. The chapter house was built between 1263 and 1284,
and the bell tower in 1265, which is about when the west front, with its 67
statues, was finished.
The famous
spire
However, the
feature that marks Salisbury
out from all other cathedrals is its spire. It is hard to think of Salisbury
Cathedral not having a spire, but that was indeed the original plan, with only
a low tower being in the design. Construction of a higher tower began in about
1310, and the spire was finished by 1333. The spire itself is 180 feet high,
octagonal in shape and with a base diameter of 30 feet. The total height of the
cathedral is therefore 404 feet, which makes Salisbury Cathedral the world’s
tallest surviving medieval structure.
As noted
above, the extra weight of the tower and spire caused some problems, and extra
buttresses, internal supports and iron ties had to be added (at the time of
construction and in later centuries). This was despite the deliberate use of
thin slabs of stone to form the fabric of the spire and keep the weight down.
Much of the
spire was damaged by a severe storm in 1362, and recent research has shown that
the timbers that form the internal scaffolding of the spire are younger than
the age of the original spire, which was probably built using external
scaffolding. Other major repairs were carried out in 1945-51, when the top 30
feet were rebuilt, and between 1986 and 1992.
Given the
relatively primitive techniques available to the medieval masons, and the
Cathedral’s shallow foundations, it is hardly surprising to learn that the
spire is not aligned perfectly, and that it has a lean of about 30 inches from
the vertical. In 1668, Sir Christopher Wren was contracted to survey the spire.
He inserted iron tie-rods to prevent any further movement and, when these rods
were replaced in 1951, it was found that no more movement had occurred.
The work of
Wyatt and Gilbert Scott
Apart from
general repairs and replacement of such things as window glass, two major
events that affected the fabric of the Cathedral were the restorations by James
Wyatt in 1788-91 and Sir George Gilbert Scott in 1860-78. The debate continues
over whether their changes, which reflected the taste of their times, were to
the benefit or otherwise of Salisbury Cathedral.
Wyatt’s main
change was to demolish the bell tower, which stood in the Cathedral Close, and
to replace the original choir screen. He also demolished two porches and
re-arranged the medieval tombs into symmetrical lines on either side of the
nave. His tidying extended to the Close where, as well as removing the bell
tower, he raised the overall level and flattened all the gravestones.
Undoubtedly this improved the exterior view of the Cathedral, but whether the
internal change from medieval clutter to neo-classical purity was justifiable
is another matter.
Gilbert
Scott, who was a keen exponent of the Gothic revival, sought to undo some of
the work done by Wyatt, but some of his efforts have in turn been removed in
later years. In particular, he installed wrought iron screens that had more to
do with his own ideas than those of the cathedral’s original builders, although
the screens were indeed masterpieces in their own right and have been preserved
elsewhere. However, his pure restoration work, such as to the west front where
many missing statues were replaced, must count in his favour.
The future of
Salisbury Cathedral
Given today’s
preference for preserving ancient monuments in the style originally intended,
rather than constantly “improving” them, we can be assured that the overall
appearance of Salisbury Cathedral is unlikely to change in the foreseeable
future. However, the expensive work of maintaining a fragile fabric goes on,
and it is to be hoped that many future generations will be able to marvel at
the magnificent edifice that has been already been admired for three-quarters
of a millennium.
Incidentally,
one of my own abiding memories, from the 1980s, is of working in a room that
had a clear view of Salisbury Cathedral from a distance of no more than a
quarter of a mile. To be able to glance out of the window at any moment and see
such a magnificent building was a huge privilege, not to mention a considerable
distraction!
© John
Welford